that JDA is abandoned and interpolation
is also not signed and Exs.P.7 and 8 already produced and JDA is
not acted upon ... JDA and a detailed discussion was made.
The learned counsel brought to the notice of this Court that the
JDA was not acted upon
Act, 1882 (for short, "the TP
Act "), the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment by
issuing notice under Section 148 of the IT Act ... Act would not dilute the applicability of Section 2(47)(v) of the
IT Act. According to learned Senior Standing Counsel, the JDA
CONCILIATION ACT 1996, TO ADJUDICATE THE
DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES UNDER SECTION 11 (6) OF THE
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, JDA DATED ... between the parties under Section 11 (6) of
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. JDA dated.
1.6.2017 vide Annexure-B
b. Grant such other reliefs
under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for
short, 'the Arbitration Act ').
FACTS OF THE CASE:
2. With a view ... period of
thirty six months as stipulated in the JDA. As per the JDA, time
of eighteen months was granted to the respondent to complete
provisions of Section 11(6) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act' for short)
for appointment of the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate ... Act, 1996 .
VI. REGARDING COMPLIANCE OF SECTION
11(5) OF THE ACT
14. It is not in dispute that the parties to the JDA
Act, 2007 (for short 'Act'). The petitioner was not
a party before the Assistant Commissioner. The parties to
the partition deed and JDA ... partition deed. The
respondents' family members entered JDA with the
petitioner under the registered JDA dated 24.01.2014.
Respondent No.1 affixed her signature
Act, 2007 (for short 'Act'). The petitioner was not
a party before the Assistant Commissioner. The parties to
the partition deed and JDA ... partition deed. The
respondents' family members entered JDA with the
petitioner under the registered JDA dated 24.01.2014.
Respondent No.1 affixed her signature
said JDA dated
11.1.2019 vide 'Deed of Cancellation of JDA' on
17.3.2022. Thereafter, the defendant No.3, Company
entered into another JDA ... favour
defendant Nos.3 to 5, he has illegally acted for
cancellation of the JDA dated 11.1.2019. Therefore, the
plaintiff has filed the suit
said JDA dated
11.1.2019 vide 'Deed of Cancellation of JDA' on
17.3.2022. Thereafter, the defendant No.3, Company
entered into another JDA ... favour
defendant Nos.3 to 5, he has illegally acted for
cancellation of the JDA dated 11.1.2019. Therefore, the
plaintiff has filed the suit
Crores from
3
him. The petitioner did not act upon in pursuance of the JDA in
respect of 8 acres and 64 guntas of land ... learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
that when the JDA not acted upon, notice was issued and reply
was also given and thereafter
