that an FIR
cannot be quashed on the basis of a partial compromise. The relevant
extracts/paras are reproduced hereunder:-
"15. An incisive reading ... suggest that
the said principles became erected, even when a partial
compromise became arrived at amongst the concerned, and/or
when no composite compromise became
accused have approached this Court. As such, it is a partial
compromise, which has been specifically
specifically transcribed by the Division Bench of
this Court ... reference to the larger Bench as to whether the partial compromise or
piecemeal compromise with some of the accused is permissible or not, upon
which
partition dated 18.11.2005 are null and void. The
alleged admission in the compromise petition regarding the
title of Respondents 3, 4, 6, and 7 pertains ... interpreted
'ejusdem generis', and a compromise petition does not fall
within its ambit. A compromise petition inherently involves
obligations and counter-obligations. Unless
partition dated 18.11.2005 are null and void. The
alleged admission in the compromise petition regarding the
title of Respondents 3, 4, 6, and 7 pertains ... interpreted
'ejusdem generis', and a compromise petition does not fall
within its ambit. A compromise petition inherently involves
obligations and counter-obligations. Unless
M/S. Ashutosh Roy Prafulla Kumar Roy And ... vs Md. Iqbal Khan And on 25
compromise nor has he signed the compromise
deed. The absence of his participation and consent renders the
compromise incomplete and legally unenforceable. A compromise that ... 2217/2025
does not recognize a partial compromise that seeks to bind some parties
while excluding others who are equally interested and affected.
Therefore
Vinayak
Belapurkar, was dealing with an argument that by virtue of
the compromise, during the pendency of the suit, there was a
transfer of property ... This court, in the facts of the case,
held that the compromise partially recognised the title of the
plaintiff to institute the suit for redemption
District Moga and all
consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise
(Annexure P-3).
2. On 22.11.2024, the following order was passed ... Kaur wife of Pargat Singh has not been made party
and partial compromise cannot take place and other convicts have filed an appeal
which
compromise between remaining accused
persons namely Harpreet Singh, Kamaljit Singh, Paramjeet Singh and Baljit
Singh and complainant Lakhvir Singh also stands effected vide compromise ... thus, the present quashing petition is not on the basis of
partial compromise, rather all accused/persons petitioners have come to this
Court for quashing
learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Ludhiana has concluded in the report that the compromise
effected between the parties is genuine, voluntarily and without any coercion ... thus, the present
quashing petition is not on the basis of partial compromise, rather all
accused/persons petitioners have come to this Court for quashing
