before
31.12. 1976. This notice was first sent by post. The postman
called at the address on 7.12.1976 and 8.12.1976 but, having
failed to find ... present case, it is submitted, the evidence shows that the
postman made no serious efforts to ascertain the whereabouts
of the addressee even though
condition precedent, a dubious service held established by
examining the postman who must be delivering hundreds of
postal envelopes and who is ready ... statement on oath made by him to the effect that no
postman had ever gone to him with a registered letter either
statement on oath made by him to the effect that no postman had ever gone to him with a registered letter either ... this part of the appellant's evidence as also the postman's evidence on the point and that on an appreciation of such
which held that the
appointment from GDS/EDA to the post of Postman is only by promotion and
not direct recruitment, and that because ... restriction under Column No. 7(2) of the Department of Posts (Postman/
Village Postman and Mail Guards) Recruitment Rules, 1989 (hereinafter
referred
business address,
Alka Cinema, P-2, Sector -15, NOIDA. The Postman visited
the cinema premises on 30th August, 1999 but Subhash
Chander was not present ... Postman went to the address
again the next day but Subhash Chander refused to receive
the registered envelope, though the name of the sendor
delivery of postal article of any description to a postman or other person authorised to receive postal articles of that description for the post shall
particular cases including this case of delivery of the letter by the postman to the addressee. it is will known that letters are delivered into ... registered letter had been returned with the remark endorsed by the postman that the addressee had refused to accept the same. The learned Judge
dated 7.7.99 (A6) selecting fourth respondent as Postman overlooking him, both issued by the 1st respondent and letter ... seniority quota of EDAs for promotion to the cadre of Postman. He submitted that he was working as Extra Departmental Letter Box Peon at Ernakulam
tactics of the respondents those notices could not be served by the postman as they did not accept those notices even after intimation regarding those ... correct address no burden is cast upon the send or the postman to arrange that notice to be served upon the addressee. If a letter
Departmental
Promotion Examination for the promotional cadre (Class
III) of Postman and allied services from Class IV. On April
30, 1969, the appellant, along with ... candidates, was declared successful and eligible for
promotion to the post of Postman and allied cadre. But it
was alleged that there were some irregularities
