next contended that as the notice was served by refusal and Postman was not produced to prove it, the suit could not have been decreed ... ordinate Bench rendered in case of Harish Chandra (supra) to demonstrate that Postman was never produced to prove the refusal.
22. Recently, the co-ordinate
otherwise found eligible, to
appoint him against a vacant post of Postman, on the
promotional quota of the GDS, as would be available at
present ... promotion of Group-D (MTS) & GDS to the cadre of
Postman for the vacancies of the years 2009 & 2010. The
said LDCE
revisionist to have rebutted the aforesaid presumption of service by examining the postman, however, by merely making a bald denial the presumption cannot stand rebutted ... undertaken any exercise to rebut the presumption nor attempted to produce the postman as a witness. In the aforesaid circumstances, the presumption of service
brother and so possibly he
did not receive the intimation of the postman. He has
deposed that he did not get notice sent under certificate ... posting. The District Court has held that it was
necessary to examine postman to prove endorsement of
postman appearing on the envelop. It needs
letter dated
24-7-1992. P.W. 15 (Natesan) was the Postman in the
General Post Office, Trivandrum during the period ... also seized during the above search.
P.W.21 (Devanandan) was the postman of the Head Post
Office, Kollam, during the year 1991. He proved
acknowledgment of any receiving of the notice was ever returned by the postman which as per the plaintiff was affixed in a conspicuous place ... finding that the aforesaid notice was sent through post and once the postman made an endorsement that the defendant/tenant was not met despite numerous
been given to them as notices are returned back with endorsement of postman as "ckj ckj tkus ij Hkh edku ij rkyk can jgrk ... required on the part of plaintiff-respondent to examine the postman in Court to prove the service of notice for which no application had ever
sent to his known residential
address through post registered with AD. The postman
entrusted with the service of the notice visited the house ... petitioner refused to receive the registered letter and told
the postman that the addressee was out of station. The
envelope containing the notice was returned
Thereafter, he was promoted to
the post of 'Postman' with effect from 25.08.2010. The Petitioner
further states that Pension to the Employees ... date. When the
Petitioner was granted promotion to the post of 'Postman', he thought
that his service would be covered under
plaintiff to prove by cogent evidence and if necessary by examining the Postman that the letter was offered to addressee but he declined to accept ... delivery of a postal article of any description to a postman or other person authorized to receive postal articles of that description for the post
