Smt Vijayalaxmi Shetty vs Mr Kochu Shetty on 11 November, 2020
defamatory
material and offering for sale or selling any such printed or
engraved defamatory material constitute distinct offences. The
learned counsel also brought
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 81 (1.07 seconds)Ramesh vs State By on 11 March, 2022
come to know that the finger print matches with
the finger print of this petitioner.
14. The material also disclose that this petitioner himself
took ... finger print
12
on the steel tiffin box and the same matches with the finger print
of the petitioner.
18. When all these materials
Hanamanth S/O Magundappa Hulasageri vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 April, 2026
prints found at the place of occurrence and also the
expert evidence of PW14. In terms of Exhibit P53 and Exhibit P54
and chance prints ... marking of comparison between the chance
prints and the fingerprints of the accused.
35. The material available on record which points out the
accused only
Malappa @ Malingaraya vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 December, 2021
held that in majority decision by
use of material sample such as finger prints for the
purpose of comparison and identification held that it does
Sapna Rohira vs Mukund Chandi Bammar on 13 January, 2026
substantiated by placing any material before the Court. But,
the fact is that marriage was fixed and the cards were printed
and even invited ... booked i.e., Hotel Capital and thereafter,
printed the card and distributed the same. When such material
Sri. Mukund Chandi Bammar vs State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2026
substantiated by placing any material before the Court. But,
the fact is that marriage was fixed and the cards were printed
and even invited ... booked i.e., Hotel Capital and thereafter,
printed the card and distributed the same. When such material
Smt. Laxmi Ravindra Hebbalkar, vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2019
speaks about the
restrictions on the printing of pamphlets, posters
etc. but in the instant case, nowhere in the
complaint ... charge sheet there is
4
no whisper or material alleging that the petitioner
was involved in printing of pamphlets or posters
and hence the proceedings
Shivarajkumar S/O Basappa Gudimani vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 December, 2021
accused No.3 has supplied the fake notes and accused
No.4 printed the fake notes. Hence, these petitioners have
been arrayed as accused ... custody from
27.09.2021. The Material has to be collected from both of
them regarding printing of fake notes.
6. Having heard the respective counsels
Rachaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 November, 2018
victim and there is no piece of material before the
Court to show that the finger print of the accused
person was available. Further, though ... their presence the galata took place
between them after taking meal. No material was seized
when the mahazar was conducted and further
important to note
Ravikumar vs B A Harish Gowda on 31 May, 2022
bottom of the
last page of journal about the place of printing the said journal.
5. Based on the complaint and sworn statement, the
Trial ... false declaration before the District Magistrate
with regard to the place of printing the journal. The accused, in
order to prove his case, neither examined