agreement was executed subsequent to A1 Privilege Insurance Enrolment Forum. So, at the time of submission of A1 document, the B1 agreement ... second opposite party New India Assurance Company Ltd. Ext.A1 document namely, Privilege Insurance Enrolment Forum submitted by the subscriber P.V.Balakrishnan would
shall stand forfeited to the
Corporation.
In
view of the above stated documents it is contended by learned counsel for the
appellant-opposite parties that ... while repudiated the claim of complainant in view of the conditions
and privileges of the policy which is reproduced as under:-
Forfeiture in certain events
scheme, it was made clear to the
investors through the offer document containing terms and conditions
that the trustees may, from time to time ... rights and
privileges pertaining to their investment in the scheme as were
available to them under the original offer document except the level
conditions and privileges of the policy and prayed for dismissal
of the complaint.
In
support of her claim, the complainant relied upon documents marked
privileges available
in the policy, a claim can be made, only on the happening of any of the
contingencies, given in the policy document, which
nominal member and duly registered member with regard to
their rights and privileges, is outside scope of Boards power under Section
119-Jalgaon District Central ... cent. PAN of the deductee
should be mentioned in any correspondence and document which is exchanged
between the deductor and deductee.
Keeping
in view
Mr. Kallol Basu vs British Airway & Others on 27 May, 2010
State Consumer Disputes
The Divisional Manager,Life Insurance ... vs E. Sujatha,School Street, ... on 28 September, 2010
BEFORE
M/S Northern Motors Private Limited vs Bahadur Singh Son Of Shri Tarsem Singh on
consumer and is entitled to get all protection, rights and privileges as envisaged under the Consumer Protection Act . Thus, the complainant claimed compensation ... lakhs with the opposite party. The averment that no original policy document was sent by the opposite party so far is not fully correct. Since
