Annexure P-2. Now, it is alleged that she was declared proclaimed
offender on 05.06.2012 and therefore, she is apprehending her arrest. She
was never ... regarding her. Now, it is alleged that she was declared proclaimed
offender on 05.06.2012 and the police is trying to arrest her after a period
local
jurisdiction for the arrest of any escaped convict,
8
proclaimed offender or of any person who is accused of a
non-bailable offence ... warrant of arrest
under Section 73 (1) when any convict escaped, proclaimed offender
or any person who is accused of a non-bailable offence
consequential
proceedings including the proceedings for declaring the petitioner a
proclaimed offender keeping in view the fact that the co-accused of the
petitioner were ... During the course of investigation while the petitioner was
declared a proclaimed offender. The report under Section 173(2) Cr.PC was
presented against Vijay
consequential proceedings including the proceedings for declaring the
petitioner a proclaimed offender vide order dated 22.02.2014 keeping in
view the fact that the co-accused ... petitioner were nominated as accused. While the petitioner was
declared a proclaimed offender, his co-accused came to be acquitted vide
judgment dated
consequential proceedings including the proceedings for declaring the
petitioner a proclaimed offender vide order dated 12.09.2014 keeping in
view the fact that the co-accused ... course of the investigation, while the petitioner was
declared a proclaimed offender, Vijay Kumar @ Bhola and Sham Lal were
arrested and on conclusion
summons or the warrants and proclamation and
so, they were declared proclaimed offenders vide order dated 25.04.2011.
4. One of the summoned accused, namely Hardip ... whereas Sarabjit
Singh had been declared as proclaimed offender. They were sentenced to
undergo varying period of imprisonments with maximum sentence of six
years rigorous
summons or the warrants and proclamation and
so, they were declared proclaimed offenders vide order dated 25.04.2011.
4. One of the summoned accused, namely Hardip ... whereas Sarabjit
Singh had been declared as proclaimed offender. They were sentenced to
undergo varying period of imprisonments with maximum sentence of six
years rigorous
summons or the warrants and proclamation and
so, they were declared proclaimed offenders vide order dated 25.04.2011.
4. One of the summoned accused, namely Hardip ... whereas Sarabjit
Singh had been declared as proclaimed offender. They were sentenced to
undergo varying period of imprisonments with maximum sentence of six
years rigorous
petitioner was erroneously declared a Proclaimed Offender
vide order dated 08.11.2016. He had already challenged the said order in a
separate petition pending before this ... murder case. Two accused were arrested and three were
declared Proclaimed Offenders. The two accused, who were arrested, were
tried and convicted by Trial Court
summons or the warrants and proclamation and
so, they were declared proclaimed offenders vide order dated 25.04.2011.
4. One of the summoned accused, namely Hardip ... whereas Sarabjit
Singh had been declared as proclaimed offender. They were sentenced to
undergo varying period of imprisonments with maximum sentence of six
years rigorous
