Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1368 (1.74 seconds)

Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Mumbai vs Dy.C.I.T., Cent.Cir.10(2)(2), Mumbai on 22 July, 2020

guidelines laid down in the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend the Grounds ... Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquettes and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, which regulated the code of conduct of doctors and their professional associations as regards their
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Liva Healthcare Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee on 12 September, 2016

Indian Medical Council (Professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 prohibits vide regulation 6.4.1 the physician to receive any gifts, gratuity, commission or bonus ... Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 governing professional ethics of Doctors issued is salutary which is in the interest of public
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajanta Pharma Ltd.,, Mumbai vs Dcit,Cc-7(2), Mumbai, Mumbai on 25 May, 2021

being in violation of the provisions of Indian Medical Council (Professional conduct, etiquette and ethics) regulations, 2002 were inadmissible as an expense. Observing, that ... take action against the registered medical professionals under the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, and it had no jurisdiction
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 56 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Acit (Inv.) vs P.N. Writer And Co. on 6 August, 2004

goods or a business service. Professional service is not guided so much by profit considerations as by professional ethics which requires a particular standard ... common thread in all the professional services is that they are generally guided more by professional ethics than by profit motive. Again this aspect
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 38 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Dcit , Cc- 2(4), Mumbai vs Macelods Pharmaceuticals Limited, ... on 14 October, 2021

freebies to medical professionals, which is hit by rule 6.8.1 of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002- as amended from time ... freebies to medical professionals, which is hit by rule 6.8.1 of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002- as amended from time
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Aristo Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Circle 2(1)(1), Mumbai on 28 June, 2019

take action against the registered medical professionals under the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, and it has no jurisdiction ... medical practitioners or their professional associations in violation of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, the expenditure incurred
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Aristo Pharmaceuticals Private ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax - ... on 15 January, 2020

take action against the registered medical professionals under the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, and it has no jurisdiction ... medical practitioners or their professional associations in violation of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, the expenditure incurred
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next