Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Supreme Court Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr on 17 April, 1998 Equivalent

Supreme Court Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr on 17 April, 1998 Bench

liti- gants to the advocates who are mindful of professional ethics and believe in maintaining the decorum of courts." When a member

conduct of P.D. Gupta in circumstance s was unbecoming of professional ethics and conduct. Bar Council of India also observed : " It is acknowledged ... respondent is patently unbecoming of a lawyer and against professional ethics. Consequently, we feel that as an exemplary punishment, Shri P.D. Gupta should

court was not in consonance with the standards of professional ethics expected from a senior member of the profession We are, therefore, of the view

case would amount to professional misconduct. But negligence without moral turpitude or delinquency may not amount to professional misconduct. In the case ... entrusted with a brief he is expected to follow norms of professional ethics and try to protect interests of his client in relation to whom

Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the Code of Medical Ethics made by the Medical Council of India, as approved by the Government of India ... professional association which regulates admission and seeks to uphold the standards of the profession through professional codes on matters of conduct and ethics

empowers the council to prescribe the standards of professional conduct and etiquette and code of ethics for medical practitioners and to ensure their observance. Section

empowers the council to prescribe the standards of professional conduct and etiquette and code of ethics for medical practitioners and to ensure their observance. Section

Council of India to prescribe the standards of professional conduct and etiquette and a code of ethics for medical practitioners. Section 21 makes provision