Chand Narain Gautam vs Smt. Saroj Gautam on 1 November, 1974
pleading and the proof has for its foundation the salutary check which prudence and principles of natural justice impose against embellishment by a party
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 129 (0.86 seconds)Banshilal vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 11 May, 2004
Thus, it is clear from above the there is no requirement to check the identities of the Members signing the motion and the notice contemplated ... thereon are fake the rule of prudence requires the Chief Executive Officer himself or his nominee to check the identities of the persons signing
Jhuma Ram vs Prami Bai on 31 January, 1973
legal disputes is to be checked. It is a recognised public policv in all civilized systems of iuris-prudence. In this very case Jhuma
State Of Rajasthan vs Javed Khan @ Javed Juniyar And Ors on 22 July, 2019
check
valve to the evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
Abhimanyu Sharda Son Of Narayan Sharda vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 January, 2022
Abhimanyu Sharda Son Of Narayan Sharda vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 January, 2022
State Of Rajasthan vs Dr Abdul Hameed on 22 July, 2019
check
valve to the evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
Dr Abdul Hameed vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 22 July, 2019
check
valve to the evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
Vishnu Dutta Soni vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 July, 2005
Court had observed that the aforesaid requirements are a mere rule of prudence and the ultimate test is whether the dying declaration can be held ... interested in fabricating the dying declaration, no question arises to checking the genuineness of the dying declaration recorded by the Executive Magistrate
Suman Singh (Smt.) vs State Of Raj. And Ors. on 18 February, 2008
owner/driver will certainly produce all the documents at the time of checking, and in the present case the Excise Commissioner himself has passed ... transit pass, permit and license were not produced at the time of checking. In my opinion, the learned Excise Commissioner passed the order
Kaliya vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 February, 1984
prosecution story relating to one accused has been found untrue, prudence requires that the residue of the prosecution story relating to appellant Kaliya must ... examined and scanned with extra care and caution, applying all the checks and balances available on record.
15. It is true that the burden