check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
check valve to the evidence of identification in
court of an accused by a witness and the same is
a rule of prudence
piece of evidence as a rule of law, but the rule of prudence demands that in the absence of a TIP having been held properly ... that the accused-petitioner was present in the police party, which had checked the luggage of P.W. 4, there can remain no doubt that
State (Govt. Of Delhi) vs Ishwar Chand Harit & Ors. on 9 January, 2017
Author
without any aid or any other source. The test is done
to check upon their veracity. In other words, the main object
of holding ... trustworthiness of that evidence. It is
accordingly considered a safe rule of prudence to generally
CRL.A.661/2010 & CRL.A.1046/2010 Page
Surjeet Munda vs State on 2 March, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 499
Author
Ganga Singh & Others vs State Of U.P. on 8 September, 2016
Author: Ranjana