Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

centrally appointed constitutional functionary to keep a dossier on his Ministers or to report against them or to take up public stances critical of Government

that the decision to transfer the applicant has been taken in public interest after application of mind to all the relevant facts. 16. Also ... Mohinder Singh (Supra) wherein it has been laid that when a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds, its validity must be judged

Mr. Vivek Batra vs The Union Of India on 22 October, 2013 Central Administrative Tribunal

least, it should not have been got considered by a lower functionary. They should have either advised the Applicant to submit his representation ... further hold that when the entry is communicated to him the public ser-vant should have a right to make a representation against the entry

year 1979 by S.D.M., Jhunjhunu after verification by the Revenue Functionaries certifying that she belongs to Sonkatkari Tribe. In 1980, the applicant ... further when she was appointed as Principal through Union Public Service Commission in 1998 and also at the time of her confirmation in the same

Mrs. Manorama Bhatnagar vs Govt. Of Nct Delhi Through on 30 October, 2013 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE

Apex Court had ruled that any order of the public authority should be speaking and self-contained one, and cannot be construed in the light ... mind, or what he intended to do. Public orders made by public authorities are meant to have public effect, and are intended to affect

(Service Of All Notices On The vs Shri B.N. Vaish on 28 June, 2013

Platoon No. 6 vs Uoi & Ors on 9 May, 2013 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL

Ved Pal Singh vs Union Of India Through on 3 December, 2013 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL