Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.06 seconds)

Nilkanta Rai vs Gosto Behari Chatterjee on 13 August, 1917

distribute them rateably. This application was dismissed. The petitioner now contends that the assets should be rateably distributed by the Subordinate Judge amongst all persons ... Procedure, inclusive of himself. 2. The petitioner is not entitled to rateable distribution under Section 73 , which provides that where assets are held
Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ram Narain And Anr. vs Brij Bankey Lal on 15 January, 1917

creditors of the judgment-debtors had come in asking for a rateable distribution, the creditors in question holding decrees passed against the same judgment-debtors ... various judgment-creditors now interested in the matter applied for rateable distribution of certain moneys in the possession of the Court belonging to these judgment
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Brij Banke Lal vs Ram Narain And Anr. on 15 January, 1917

other creditors of the judgement-debtors had come in asking for rateable distribution, the creditors in question holding decrees passed against the same judgement-debtors ... various judgement-creditors now interested in the matter applied for rateable distribution of certain moneys in the possession of the court belonging to these judgement
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Nilmoni Dey vs Hira Lal Das on 21 August, 1917

Code (Act V of 1908), Section 73, Order XXXI, Rule 2 - Rateable distribution--Decrees obtained against some out of several executors, whether capable of execution ... question now arises, whether these two decree-holders are entitled to rateable distribution of the assets under Section 73 of the Civil Procedure Code
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next