application to the
Returning Officer for recounting of votes, pursuant to which the
votes were recounted. Thereupon, it was found that the
petitioner had received ... specifically bars
any further application for recount, once the Returning Officer
has permitted recounting of votes on a written application by
any of the candidates
basis he had secured 131 votes and the petitioner Bhagwat More had secured 130 votes. Apparently, recounting was ordered on an application made ... respondent No. 2 secured 131 votes and the petitioner got 130 votes and, therefore, the order of recounting was justified. It is obviously the case
votes being only one, cannot be a reason to presume
that there was any illegality in the counting of votes, requiring recounting
at this stage ... erroneous sorting and counting of votes. Another
circumstances weighed with the High Court was small margin
of votes (19 votes) between the returned candidate
allegation of non-acceptance of demand for
recounting of votes by the Returning Officer/Assistant Returning Officer is
concerned, Mr. Sakhare would submit that ... votes, improper reception of tendered votes after completion of counting of
EVM votes would definitely affect the result of returned candidate. That
even qua counting
allegation of non-acceptance of demand for
recounting of votes by the Returning Officer/Assistant Returning Officer is
concerned, Mr. Sakhare would submit that ... votes, improper reception of tendered votes after completion of counting of
EVM votes would definitely affect the result of returned candidate. That
even qua counting
allegation of non-acceptance of demand for
recounting of votes by the Returning Officer/Assistant Returning Officer is
concerned, Mr. Sakhare would submit that ... votes, improper reception of tendered votes after completion of counting of
EVM votes would definitely affect the result of returned candidate. That
even qua counting
petitioner, total
votes polled at polling station No.40 is 298 votes, while votes counted are
545 votes (difference of 247 votes). Similarly ... votes polled are 319 votes while the votes counted are
401 votes (difference of 82 votes). In these circumstances, the petitioner has
sought recounting
votes while the respondent No.4 polled 2662 votes. However, when the results
were declared, the petitioner was declared elected having polled 2714 votes while ... clear case made out in that regard no direction to recount the votes could
::: Uploaded on - 04/12/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/04/2020
votes while the respondent No.4 polled 2662 votes. However, when the results
were declared, the petitioner was declared elected having polled 2714 votes while ... clear case made out in that regard no direction to recount the votes could
::: Uploaded on - 04/12/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/04/2020
There is difference between the recount within the counting station and the judicial recount. The judicial power of recount is to be exercised sparingly ... case for judicial recount and secondly, if the judicial recount is necessary, then, whether on judicial recount the election of the petitioner
