also to be stated that Rule 26 of CCS
(Pension) Rules specifically provides that resignation
from a service or post entails forfeiture of past service ... Rules for purposes of determining pension entitlement
under Rule 49 thereof. Hence, the petitioner's retirement under
Rule 19 cannot be equated with resignation
also to be stated that Rule 26 of CCS
(Pension) Rules specifically provides that resignation
from a service or post entails forfeiture of past service ... Rules for purposes of determining pension entitlement
under Rule 49 thereof. Hence, the petitioner's retirement under
Rule 19 cannot be equated with resignation
Forfeiture of service on resignation
(1) Resignation from a service or a post, entails
forfeiture of past service.
(2) A resignation shall not entail forfeiture ... above rules reveals that the case of
the petitioner does not fall under Rule 25 of the Pension Rules
1996; therefore, there was no legal
combined reading of Rule 19 of the BSF Rules and Rule 49(2)
(b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules. Therefore, to understand
paragraph ... Rule 19 of the Border
Security Force Rules, 1969, framed under the BSF Act, 1968 ,
when read together with Rule
Ravi Kumar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench
Dheeraj Khator vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench
Sunita Kumari vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench
Himanshu Sharma vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench
Brijendra Panwar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench
Atul Kumar Dadheech vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 16 October, 2024
Author: Farjand Ali
