The State Of H.P vs Vishal Alias Vickey & Others on 17 August, 2018
Reserved On: 01.01.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 6 January, 2025
Author: Tarlok Singh
credibility of the
prosecution. Even for the said purpose the retracted
confession on the part of the accused could not have been
taken recourse
credibility
of the prosecution. Even for the said purpose the retracted
confession on the part of the accused could not have been
taken recourse
very slender. The main evidence
against the appellant consists of the retracted confession
made by the accused before the Magistrate where he
admitted to have ... This
confession has been held to be voluntary both by the
High Court and Sessions Court and nevertheless as the
confession was retracted corroboration
very slender. The main evidence
against the appellant consists of the retracted confession
made by the accused before the Magistrate where he
admitted to have ... This
confession has been held to be voluntary both by the
High Court and Sessions Court and nevertheless as the
confession was retracted corroboration
credibility of the prosecution. Even for the said purpose
the retracted confession on the part of the accused could
not have been taken recourse
credibility of the prosecution. Even for the said
purpose the retracted confession on the part of
the accused could not have been taken
recourse
applicant, is
pursuant to his confession made before the learned
Special Judge, which confession admittedly has not been
retracted by him. Accordingly, the application
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sonu & Another on 15 November, 2019
Bench