Therefore, there was a proposal to hold a meeting of the review
DPC to consider the cases of Junior Engineers for their promotion as
Asstt ... been nominated as
representative of SC/ST category in the said Review DPC as per the
instructions of the Government of India in this regard
grading in the ACRs are
upgraded to the prescribed benchmark, a review DPC would be
held to consider the case of the Applicants for promotion ... state before this court as regards
the status of the review DPC which had also been directed by virtue of the
impugned order. The learned
seniority retrospectively of the Applicant vis-`-vis Private Respondents by convening review DPC/DPCs for senior time scale to Junior Administrative Grade of IIS Group ... place, the applicant would become junior to his juniors as the review DPC would correct the seniority of the applicant which has not taken place
review DPC held for 1998 DPC as he was not eligible at that time. Furthermore, there has been no DPC held in the year ... DPC. It is relevant to note in this regard that the administrative instructions issued by the Government with regard to holding DPC or the review
would not be retrospectively applicable since the review DPC was held on 04.03.2009 prior to the issue of the said OM. He is also aggrieved ... dated 13.04.2010 (Annexure A-3) of DOP&T to the review DPC to be held for the post of SSP in the case
grading in the ACRs are
upgraded to the prescribed benchmark, a review DPC would be
held to consider the case of the Applicants for promotion ... state before this court as regards
the status of the review DPC which had also been directed by virtue of the
impugned order. The learned
grading in the ACRs are
upgraded to the prescribed benchmark, a review DPC would be
held to consider the case of the Applicants for promotion ... state before this court as regards
the status of the review DPC which had also been directed by virtue of the
impugned order. The learned
view of the above peculiar recording by the DPC, a review DPC was held in the UPSC to consider the applicants case ... period from 1984-1985 to 31.03.1991 were considered. The review DPC did not recommend his name for inclusion in panel for the vacancies
applicant is accepted, the respondents would consider by constituting a review DPC the name of the applicant for promotion on the post of Superintending Engineer ... DPC. The contention advanced by Shri Padama Kumar S. is that the DPC year takes into account 1st April of the relevant year of DPC
vide letter dated 19.03.2008 pertaining to withholding of recommendation of the review DPC convened on 23.07.2007, and in consequence thereof, to give effect ... recommendations of the review DPC.
2. The brief facts on which the reliefs as mentioned above are sought to rest reveal that the applicant
