Service
working as CIT and CCIT for further promotion by a review DPC on the
ground that the ACRs in question were below bench mark ... Reviewing Officer or
both are available or not. In case, the ACR is upgraded, making the
incumbent eligible for consideration, review DPC would be held
Registrar (OB). We have seen the DPC minutes dated 1.2.2006 where the DPC held on 12.9.2004 was reviewed on 16.8.2005 where certain persons have ... review DPC as per the guidelines for DPC in Part-VI para 18.1 of the instructions dated 27.3.1997 clearly envisages that the review DPC would
Grade-I (Pathology) w.e.f. 10.8.1987 on the recommendation of review DPC held by UPSC, the 4th respondent, on 1.8.2005. As a result ... proceedings of the DPC meeting were required to be reviewed by constituting a review DPC. It is stated that there is no specified time limit
chosen to go by the remarks of the
reviewing authority. Insofar as, the proceedings
of review DPC are concerned, it is clearly stated
in para ... consideration other attributes recorded in the
ACR by the reviewing authority. Assuming that
the review DPC could go beyond the technical
and factual mistakes
amended directions which read as under:
"(a) Respondents shall hold Review
DPC for all the vacancies starting from
the year 2001-2002 till ... convene Review DPCs for the post of
DDG(S) and thereafter for the post of ADG. The Review DPC
ought to have been completed
Kumar v. General Manager,
Northern Railway , directing petitioners to hold a review DPC to consider
the claim of the respondent for promotion to the post ... case the respondent is found fit for promotion
by review DPC then to grant all the consequential benefits from the date
the juniors
direction was given to the respondents to convene a review DPC in order to consider the case of the applicant in reference to the panel ... Review DPC. The DPC has assessed him on the basis of ACRs of five years preceding the DPC years and in view of the over
these representations and counter-representation, there was a limited review of the review DPC as a result of which the name of the Applicant ... Review Boards where necessary, was made on the basis of ACRs only, as was also done by the original Boards.
Initially the review DPC
original DPC met viz. 25.3.1987, if necessary by convening a review DPC. If he is found fit for promotion his name shall be included ... DPC if his junior was considered in the original DPC. Since one of their juniors in the respective disciplines were considered in the original DPC
upgraded, the applicant shall be considered for promotion by a review DPC to be held within one month from the date of upgradation. On promotion ... Grade of SAG w.e.f. 28.12.2005 by holding a Review DPC.
(iv) Direct the respondents to give all consequential benefits to the applicant including
