sent by the office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (for short RPFC) to the Petitioner was at 25,
East Azad Nagar, Delhi. This notice ... same telephone numbers, several partners being common, etc. to hold that the RPFC was not wrong in treating two establishments as one for the purposes
25th November,
1982 of the respondent no.1 Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC)
holding the petitioners liable for deposit of provident fund of the workers ... contribution towards provident fund of the
employees in the said cinema. The RPFC vide notice dated 2nd January, 1979
under Section
functioning in Faridabad. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner( in short "RPFC"), Delhi, in its order dated 12th October, 2000 referred the matter ... RPFC, Faridabad for further action including examining of clubbing of eight of above establishments with Sewa International Fashions Pvt. Ltd. In pursuant to the order
Governmental Organization (NGO). The respondent
No.2/RPFC sought to make the provisions of the Act applicable to the
petitioner and upon the petitioner disputing ... Section 7A of the Act was initiated by the respondent No.2/RPFC. The
WP(C) No.2954/1999 Page 1 of 13
petitioner does
account number was opened with respondent no. 2, (RPFC
Delhi North). Vide application dated 14.02.2008 (which date the
respondents no.1-3 claim ... issued by the employer and delivered the same to the Assistant
RPFC, who issued an acknowledgement dated 22.06.2011.
The EPF account of the petitioner
orders dated 28th January, 2000 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC), Delhi under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous ... sale of fruits in Subzi Mandi, Azadpur. The Inspector of the RPFC visited the premises of the petitioner establishment on 22nd June and 6th July
provident fund for the employees
engaged through a contractor. The respondent RPFC, owing to the definition
W.P.(C) 2413/1986 Page ... notice to the contractor has
to be done first by the RPFC and not by this Court. The counsel for the
respondent RPFC also agrees
Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
Mr. P. S. Patwala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Amita Gupta ... Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
+ W.P.(C) 6964/2014 & CM APPL. 30332/2022
FOOD
Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
Mr. P. S. Patwala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Amita Gupta ... Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
+ W.P.(C) 6964/2014 & CM APPL. 30332/2022
FOOD
Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
Mr. P. S. Patwala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Amita Gupta ... Avnish Singh, Ms. Pushplata
Singh and Mr. Mahendra Vikram
Singh, Advocates for RPFC(EPFO)
+ W.P.(C) 6964/2014 & CM APPL. 30332/2022
FOOD