February 2001 accused persons were examined
u/s 313 Cr.P.C ., thereafter petition filed u/s 319 Cr.P.C. was
moved ... that too after examination of accused persons u/s
313 and the application filed u/s 319 Cr..C. is hit by delay and
latches
like a
St. Vs. Satish Kumar FIR no. 381/99, P.S. Mehrauli
17
daughter to him but he continued and said that there ... offence u/s 323 / 325 IPC is made out against the accused?
The term "hurt" is defined u/s 319 IPC, which read
accused is acquitted
for the offence u/s 341 IPC
14. Coming now to the offence u/s 323 IPC . The complainant
categorically mentioned that ... required to be proved.
15. Hurt has been defined u/s 319 IPC to include any kind of bodily
pain. Now it is obvious that
Police
Colony, SectorÂ5, Narela,
Delhi.
(2). Mahesh S/o Shri
Bhanu Ram, R/o H.No.
573, Police Colony,
Contd.....
FIR No. 441/1997 ... however, subsequently the other accused namely Mahesh
S/o Shri Bhanu Ram was summoned u/s 319 Cr.P.C. as per order
dated
punches. On the basis of
the allegations the accused was charged u/s 451 / 323 IPC.
Section 451 and 323 IPC are reproduced below ... thousand rupees, or with both."
Hurt is defined u/s 319 IPC which is reproduced below:
" Section 319 . Hurt.
Whoever causes bodily pain
Criminal Case/319/2002 on 21 May, 2012
FIR No. 319/02 S/V Satpal etc. U/S 341/323/34 IPC PS Subzi Mandi ... complainant : Sh. Sanjay s/o Sh. Kishan
Swaroop.
Name and address of accused : (1) Satpal s/o Jyoti
(2) Viru s/o Jyoti
Both
Isreal Singh stands acquitted for the offence u/s
18
FIR No:319/1998
State Vs. Upender Kumar ... each page.
19
FIR No:319/1998
State Vs. Upender Kumar etc.
FIR No. 319/1998
PS: Dabri
U/s 341/323/34 IPC
State
Court, Court No. 5, Meerut, in S.T. No. 206 of 2009 by which application under section 319 Cr. P. C. has been allowed ... Suresh s/o Tikram, Sanjay s/o Suresh, Neeraj s/o Suresh Pal, Raj Kumar s/o Kamlesh, r/o Gansadhal, Rajpal s/o Kuldeep
DELHI
Sessions Case No:82/11
FIR No: 319/07
Police Station : Prashant Vihar
U/s : 308 IPC
State
Versus
1. Naveen Kumar Hudda,
S ... DELHI
Sessions Case No:82/11
FIR No: 319/07
Police Station : Prashant Vihar
U/s : 308 IPC
State
Versus
1. Naveen Kumar Hudda,
S
This is the overall prosecution's evidence in this case.
11. After recording the evidence of this witness, the prosecution evidence was
closed ... only irresistible conclusion that can be drawn from the
prosecution's evidence is the conviction of the accused.
14. On the other hand, learned
