JMFC's & Sessions Judges
================================================================
SHANKRABHAI KALABHAI RABARI....Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR P P MAJMUDAR, ADVOCATE ... Respondent(s) No. 3
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR NJ SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE
GOVINDBHAI PARMAR....Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NB TIWARI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KULDEEP ... Respondent(s) No. 4
MS HANSA PUNANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM
ISMAILJI SADIKOT....Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR TUSHAR L SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s ... Magistrate, Gonal below Exhibit 53 i.e. the
application preferred u/s. 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in
Criminal Case
However, as observed
by Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia v. Barnette, 319
U.S. 624 (1943), since this power prevents the full play
Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HARSHIT S TOLIA(2708) for the Defendant(s) No. 4
MR PARTH S TOLIA(5617) for the Defendant(s ... 319/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 13/09/2021
35. IOB's actions in presenting the "discrepancies" constitute an
anticipatory breach of contract
Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HARSHIT S TOLIA(2708) for the Defendant(s) No. 4
MR PARTH S TOLIA(5617) for the Defendant(s ... 319/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 13/09/2021
35. IOB's actions in presenting the "discrepancies" constitute an
anticipatory breach of contract
What is, however, crucial to note is that in Reeta Nag's
case (supra), the Supreme Court has concluded that once
charge-sheet ... trial
warranting exercise of power under Section 319 . The Supreme
Court observed in Reeta Nag 's case (supra), that not only was
the Magistrate
inquiry or trial was commenced.
44 The objects and reasons of Section 319 of the
Cr.P.C. are as under:
The Law Commission ... State of Kerala v.
Puthenkavu N.S.S. Karayogam and Anr. ,
[(2001) 10 SCC 191], the Supreme Court observed
that once the basis
freedom of movement. This is
how Custody is dealt with in Black s Law Dictionary, (9th
ed. 2009):-
"Custody- The care and control ... synonymous
with restraint of liberty. U. S. ex rel. Wirtz V/s.
Sheehan, D.C.Wis, 319 F.Supp. 146, 147.
Accordingly, persons on probation
parte Selvarajan, [1975] 1 WIR 1688 and in de Smith's
Judicial Review of Administrative Action, (Fourth Edn. p. 219220)
submitted that this ... APSRTC ,
[1959] Supp. 1 SCR 319 (AIR 1959 SC 308) has disapproved of
Alridge's case and that natural justice demands that the hearing
