October, 2002
Equivalent citations: AIR2003BOM244, 2003(3)MHLJ450, AIR 2003 BOMBAY 244, 2004 BOMCRSUP 90, (2003) 2 HINDULR ... ground of cruelty as contemplated by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) of Section 27 of the Special Marriage
drugs was not entitled to be caught within the ambit of Section 37(3A) of the Act. Mr. Mistry relied upon the decision ... High Court in the case of Griffen Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT [2000] 244 ITR 68, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case
drugs was not entitled to be caught within the ambit of section 37(3A) of the Act. Mr. Mistry, relied upon the decision ... High Court in the case of Griffen Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT (2000) 244 ITR 68, decision of Gujarat High Court in the case
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai ... vs Sinnar Bidi Udyog Limited, Mumbai on 4 June
during the assessment year 1978-79. That the Department has not invoked Section 41(2) of the Act and, therefore, the argument was advanced ... United Provinces Electric Supply Co. [2000] 244 ITR 764 and Central India Electric Supply
