Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1466 (0.28 seconds)

State vs . Ajay Paudwal & Others on 24 June, 2023

having committed the offence punishable under Section 292 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as " IPC ... Thereafter, charge under Section 292 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was framed against all three accused persons to which they
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Khem Chand on 10 July, 2023

compliance of Section 207 of Cr. P.C. 5. Thereafter, charge under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was framed against the accused ... Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code reads as under:­ [292. Sale, etc., of obscene books, etc.-- [(1) For the purposes of sub­ section
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Raj Kishore Mehto on 21 May, 2011

relevant provisions of the law. 10. To prove its case under section 292 IPC the prosecution is firstly required to prove that the article ... considered to be obscene, has been described in the section 292 IPC itself which postulates that an article can be said to be obscene
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mahender & Ors. on 26 August, 2013

Under Section 292 of The Indian Penal Code , 1860 read with Section 34 of The Indian Penal Code , 1860. (f) Plea of accused person ... under Section 292 of The Indian Penal Code , 1860 read with Section 34 of The Indian Penal Code , 1860. The allegations against the accused persons
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 26 May, 2009

both of them. 3. Accordingly, charges u/s 63/68­ A Copyright Act, 1957 and section 292 IPC were framed against both the accused ... held guilty for the offence u/s 63 / 68 ­ A Copyright Act, 1957 and u/s 292 IPC vide judgement of this Court dated
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs : Shashi Kant on 23 December, 2014

Offence complained of or proved U/s 63/68 A Copyright Act & Section 292 IPC C. Date of Offence 18.11.2004 D. Name ... inevitable conclusion that charges under section 63 / 68A of the Act and Section 292 IPC have not been established. Accordingly, accused Shashi Kant stands
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next