Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 58 (0.99 seconds)

State vs . : Vinod on 15 May, 2012

perused thoroughly. 5. Before proceeding further, it is relevant to discuss Sec. 338 IPC, which reads as under ... both. 6. In order to secure conviction of accused Vinod under Sec. 338 IPC, requirement of Sec. 279 IPC is to be primarily satisfied
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Rajesh on 23 July, 2012

JUDGEMENT U/s. 350 Cr.P.C .: a) Date of offence : 20.03.1997 and 03.02.2011 b) Offence complained of : U/s. 279/338 ... without any licence and thereby committed offence punishable U/s. 279/338 IPC & U/s. 3/181 MV Act . He was arrested but released
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Bhagwati Prasad on 2 July, 2012

02403R0766622008 STATE VERSUS BHAGWATI PRASAD FIR No.575/07 U/s 279/337/338/304A IPC P. S. New Friends Colony Date of filing ... fled from the spot. On completion of investigation, charge- sheeted U/s 279/337/338/304A IPC was laid against the accused. 2. The Court
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Deepak Kumar on 9 April, 2012

Deepak Kumar FIR No. 479/00 PS: Keshav Puram U/s 279/338 IPC Case ID No. 02404R0261102001 JUDGEMENT A) Sl. No. of the case ... section 207 Cr.P.C and arguments on charge were heard. Ld. Predecessor served the notice for the offences U/s 279/338 IPC upon
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Raju on 20 July, 2012

Raju S/o. Sh. Bhuram Ram D) Offence complained of : U/s 279/338 IPC E) The plea of accused : Pleaded not guilty. F) Final ... 2004 notice U/s. 251 Cr.P.C was served upon the accused for trial of offences U/s 279/338
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Praveen Goyal on 22 May, 2012

DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI FIR NO: 329/2000 PS: Dabri U/s 288/338 IPC State V. Praveen Goyal Date of institution of the case ... Kailash Puri, New Delhi. e) Offence complained of : u/s 288/338 IPC f) Plea of accused : Pleaded not guilty g) Final order : Acquitted
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Param Hans on 23 April, 2012

Hans FIR No. 726/99 P. S. R.K.Puram U/s 279/338 IPC JUDGMENT: 1.Srl. No. of the case & Date ... within the ambit of criminal rashness and negligence, in terms of section 279 / 338 IPC. 10.To do the aforesaid appreciation of rashness and negligence
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next