Search Results Page

Search Results

21 - 30 of 7757 (1.23 seconds)

The State Of Maharashtra vs Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan on 10 November, 2025

footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section 464 Cr.PC...................................... 74 V. FINAL CONCLUSION .................................................... 75 3/79 ::: Uploaded ... Appellant-convict ("Sajjad") stands convicted for offenses punishable under Sections 302 , 354 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Atanu Purkayastha vs Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan ... on 10 November, 2025

footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section 464 Cr.PC...................................... 74 V. FINAL CONCLUSION .................................................... 75 3/79 ::: Uploaded ... Appellant-convict ("Sajjad") stands convicted for offenses punishable under Sections 302 , 354 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 November, 2025

footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section 464 Cr.PC...................................... 74 V. FINAL CONCLUSION .................................................... 75 3/79 ::: Uploaded ... Appellant-convict ("Sajjad") stands convicted for offenses punishable under Sections 302 , 354 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Rakesh @ Rodia & Anr vs State on 7 April, 2017

lieu of Section 120-B of IPC, Section 34 is replaced and they are punished accordingly. 20. Section 464 CrPC postulates effect ... Supreme Court while interpreting Section 464 of I.P.C. has held:- Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 - Section 222 (27 of 28) [CRLA-76/1989
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next