M/S. Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. vs Union Of India on 24 July, 2025 Page 1 of 22 against it under Section 9 and 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter, “CEA 1944”). 2. Against the Judgment dated Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document
Limited & Ors vs The Principal Commissioner Of on 22 December, 2016 Bench that penalty that had been imposed under section 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is in accordance with law. However, grant Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document
Management Limited And Others vs The Principal Commissioner Of on 19 December, 2016 Directors of the petitioning company under Section 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1994. Mr. Ganguly, learned advocate for the respondents is presently unable Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document