exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, acts sentinel qui vive and thus it has to protect the citizen from arbitrary
S. Fakruddin And Others Etc. vs The Govt. Of A. P. And Others Etc. on
Akbaruddin Owaisi vs The Govt. Of A.P. Rep., By Its Principal ... on 19 July
Rakesh Gupta And Others, Etc. vs Hyderabad Stock Exchange Ltd. And ... on 9 May, 1996
made genuinely for good cause and examine the same as the sentinel of justice and law.
15. Reference, in our view, has to be answered
B. Kota Mallaiah And Ors. vs Commissioner And Registrar Of ... on 18 September, 1990
Equivalent
this Court which has been assigned the role of a sentinel on the qui viva for protection of the fundamental rights cannot easily allow itself
controls in its actions. The Court has a duty to be the sentinel against such absolutism and arbitrariness."
22. If the State felt that
obey the due procedure
prescribed thereunder. This Court, being the sentinel on the qui vive, would
be quick to react in the event a secured
understand that judges have been assigned, by the supreme lex an independent sentinel's duty. To defeat this robe (role ?) subtly or crudely