said projects. It has changed zoning plans, usage pattern, super area, carpet area and alteration of structures. This is an indisputable fact that ... illegally demanded the allotted superficial increase in the area. Succinctly stated, the complainants have prayed that their amounts be refunded.
5. Opposite Party has contested
said projects. It has changed zoning plans, usage pattern, super area, carpet area and alteration of structures. This is an indisputable fact that ... illegally demanded the allotted superficial increase in the area. Succinctly stated, the complainants have prayed that their amounts be refunded.
5. Opposite Party has contested
said projects. It has changed zoning plans, usage pattern, super area, carpet area and alteration of structures. This is an indisputable fact that ... illegally demanded the allotted superficial increase in the area. Succinctly stated, the complainants have prayed that their amounts be refunded.
5. Opposite Party has contested
Sh. Jawahar Thakur vs Union Of India Through on 19 June, 2015
Central Administrative Tribunal
Sasan Power Limited, C/O. Reliance vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 23 March, 2015
Appeal
Santana Francisco Floriano Noronha vs Nester Thomas Sequeira on 8 May, 2015
1
BEFORE THE
Ahluwalia Cotractors(I) Ltd. vs Gurmail Singh on 30 November, 2015
Daily Order
FIRST ADDITIONAL
