changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
changing its amended
plans or seeking any additional concessions. At that time, the
MCGM did not demand any balance premium. By April 2022, the
structures ... should be limited to the scrutiny fee since there
was no material change in approval or the proposed construction
i.e., no additional construction
construed as change of user to
grant decree of eviction. The change by raising a cabin is neither
structural nor permanent, and eviction under clause ... also pleads that alleged attempt to cut open the door or change
of floor do not constitute nuisance in the eye of law to support
Shetkari Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Kolhapur ... vs Shri. Dilip Shankarrao Patil on 25 April, 2024
Author
