Rakesh And Anr. vs National Ins Co Ltd And Ors. on 2 April, 2014
Apex Court in Trilok
Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing the
numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas it had been
fixed
Search Results Page
Search Results
41 - 50 of 1640 (0.18 seconds)Rajbir Singh And Anr vs National Ins Co Ltd And Ors on 2 April, 2014
Apex Court in Trilok
Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing the
numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas it had been
fixed
New India Assurance Co Ltd Through: ... vs Devnath Thakur & Ors. on 4 July, 2014
2014 Page 5 of 7
Trilok Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing the
numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas
Bimla Devi & Anr. vs Mohan Singh & Ors. on 5 May, 2014
Apex Court in Trilok
Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing the
numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas it had been
fixed
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Om Prakash & Ors. on 3 July, 2014
Apex Court in
Trilok Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing
the numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas it had
been fixed
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Tejpal Singh & Ors. on 5 May, 2014
Apex Court in Trilok
Chandra, introduced a structural change by increasing the
numerical value of multiplier from „16‟to„18‟, whereas it had been
fixed
Umang D Hutheesing vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary & ... on 19 September, 2014
require serious repairs. He
stated that barring installing lifts, no
structural changes have been made and the
building is not preserved to the fullest
possible ... major changes. However, it would be
unfortunate if the building itself loses
its complete characteristic and is
condemned as an ordinary structure which
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Sanghvi And Doshi Enterprise on 12 November, 2014
combining the flats when the purchasers were barred from making any structural change as per the agreement and such structural changes have been made
Amneal Life Sciences Private Limited vs Respondent(S) on 21 November, 2014
increase in the equity share capital, the change in
the capital structure underwent change. The details of
the share capital were set out in paragraph ... undergone a substantial change during the current
financial year. The Chartered Accountant examined
impact of the changed capital structure of the company
and noted that
B. C. Sen & Co. Ltd vs Dagcon (India) Pvt. Ltd on 8 April, 2014
architect etc. from which it
transpires that a substantial structural change was warranted for building this
strong room with RCC pillars. There was no sanction