independent witness,
namely Jyoti Sharma but she could not be served with the summons as well
as the warrants, since she could not be located
occasions, same
was dishonoured with remarks "insufficient funds". The appellant served a
legal demand notice dated 26.08.2006 to the respondent by courier ... under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
3. The accused was summoned. Notice under Section 251 Cr PC was
framed on 31.03.2009. The respondent
investigating agency. The petitioners/complainants can
very well summon appropriate witnesses in their pre
summoning evidence to show that accused no.4 was a
fictitious ... 2013 & all connected matters Page 16 of 66
No.4 were served as noticed in the order dated 27.11.2013. Fresh notice was
directed
The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi vs Khursheed on 7 August, 2018
Equivalent citations
Court On Its Own Motion vs State on 13 November, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018
Dharaneesh Raju Shetty vs Union Of India on 1 May, 2018
Author: Vipin Sanghi
Bench