thereafter, filed by the petitioner for the release of the car on Superdari on him. Similar application was filed by respondent ... allowed the application filed by the petitioner and released the car on superdari to him. The application filed by respondent No. 2 was, however, declined
application filed by the petitioner herein for releasing the
poppy seeds on superdari has been dismissed.
2. In brief, the facts of the case ... petitioner
herein moved an application for releasing the poppy seeds on superdari
before the trial court, however, the same came to be dismissed
vehicle No. HR-16-B-6905 and had moved an application for superdari
for said vehicle in his Court. On the said application report ... owner of the vehicle was one Naveen Kumar.
Therefore, the application for superdari was returned to the petitioner in
original with a direction to produce
fact moved an application before the concerned
Illaqa Magistrate for taking the superdari of the said car and the Sub-
Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sardulgarh called ... upon the report of the police, thereafter,
released the said vehicle on superdari in favour of the petitioner vide
order dated 20.01.2014 (Annexure P9).
Counsel
court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh to
decide the issue of superdari at the earliest in view of facts and
circumstances of the case ... application filed by the petitioner for release of
the vehicle on superdari was not objected by the police. The
petitioner being the registered owner
Bank-respondent No. 2. In fact the aforesaid bank made request for superdari to the learned trial Magistrate on the ground that the bank ... custody, he applied to the learned trial Magistrate to cancel the aforesaid superdari and deliver the possession of the aforesaid car to the petitioner
forged. He also
admitted that he had taken his passport on superdari vide
superdarinana Ex.PW1/A. He also admitted the
Punchnama which ... statement. He also
admitted that he had taken his passport on superdari vide
superdarinana Ex.PW1/A. He also admitted the
Punchnama which
Estate,
whereby an application of the revisionist/accused seeking
superdari of vehicle bearing No. DL-8C-AE-0550 was dismissed.
2. The facts born ... moved an application before concerned Ld. MM seeking release
of car on superdari. Vide impunged order dated 16.07.2020, Ld.
MM dismissed his said application observing
bearing No. DL-8C-AP-1390 and DL-9S BA
6611, on superdari, was dismissed.
2. The facts born out from the Trial Court record ... bearing No. DL-8C-AP-1390 and DL-9S BA 6611
on superdari, in his favour. However, vide impugned order, Ld.
Trial Court dismissed
impugned order dated
4.5.2013 passed by the Ld. Trial Court, whereby superdari of car
no. DL 2FEF 0786 was cancelled ... further alleged that the petitioner filed application for
superdari of the said vehicle before the ld. MM and the
complainant had also filed an application
