Mazumdar, it is not competent under the Mahomedan law for a talak to be given without just cause assigned. It has never been suggested ... capriciously and arbitrarily. The question therefore is whether, in the circumstances, the talak given in this case is valid. Upon that point, there
been a divorce duly effected. Under the Mohammedan Law, divorce by talak may be effected either orally (by spoken words) or by a written document ... talaknama. No particular form of words is prescribed for effecting a talak, but the words of divorce must indicate an intention to dissolve the marriage
irrevocable form by the respondent (plaintiff in the suit) by pronouncement of talak three times on the 9th January 1906, that is sometime before ... appeal did not come to a finding on the question whether talak was in fact pronounced as alleged but being of opinion that the words
which it was observed that 'talak-ul-biddat' is the most
prevalent form of divorce among Muslims in India. It is also pointed ... intervention of the Judge. A
large and influential body of jurists regard talak emanating from the
husband as really prohibited except for necessity, such
other provision of personal law, marriage, dissolution of marriage, including talak, zihar, lian, jhula and mubaraat, maintenance, dower, guardianship, gifts, trusts, and trust properties ... marriage in England. He maintained that he had divorced his wife by talak and applied to the High Court of Justice in England
Prophet. Divorce given at the instance of husband, is known as talak whereas divorce at the instance of wife, is called Khula. According to Section ... talak may be oral or in writing.
12. So far as oral talak is concerned, there is no prescribed form. If the words are express
that his marriage had been dissolved at an earlier date in the talak form, even assuming that the fact of such dissolution at an earlier ... written statement containing such a plea of divorce in the talak form amounts to the dissolution of marriage under the Muslim Personal Law from
still permanently residing there. On June 27, 1922, Ebrahim pronounced talak against the petitioner in accordance with Mahomedan law. On April 10, 1923, the petitioner ... this, and no evidence where Ebrahim was domiciled when he pronounced talak, or what his domicile of origin was, or whether that was ever changed
Andh WR 138. Mohammad Mirza, J. referred to three different modes of talak viz. (1) Talak Ahsan, (2) Talak Hasan and (3) Talak-ul-biddat ... alleges that he has given divorce must establish what form of talak was pronounced and when it became irrevocable. Unless a person complies with
that on September
13, 1905, Ghiyas-ud-din pronounced the triple talak of divorce in the presence of witnesses, though in the absence ... Courts below that Ghiyas-ud-din did pronounce the triple talak of divorce, and that the deed of divorce is genuine, and their Lordships have
