Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 155 (0.60 seconds)

Shihabudheen @ Mahin vs Shybi on 26 August, 2009

amount claimed. It was also contended that dissolution was by talak and petitioner is not liable to pay any amount as claimed. 4. Learned Magistrate ... statement filed before the Magistrate, petitioner specifically contended that dissolution was by talak, he is not entitled to contend otherwise before this court and therefore
Kerala High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - S Nambiar - Full Document

Yusaf vs Aysha.P.A on 23 May, 2012

respondents 2 and 3. Though he contended that he had pronounced Talak, absolutely no evidence to substantiate the said contention. So long as the marriage ... husband to prove that he had pronounced a valid Talak and the said Talak was accepted by the wife. The specific contention
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - K Harilal - Full Document

Ashraf vs Jennathu Beevi on 13 March, 2002

that as the husband had not divorced the wife by pronouncing "talak" (talak, when it becomes irrevocable, puts an end to conjugal relationship ... according to any of the forms approved by the Mahomedan law, viz., Talak ahsan, which consists of a single pronouncement of divorce during tuhr (period
Kerala High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pallipattu Kadeeja vs K. Beeran on 23 May, 2009

dissolved, has not chosen to produce copy of the letter of divorce(talak) or anything to show that such letter of talak had been communicated ... establish such divorce satisfactorily. He must show that he had pronounced the talak and intimated the talak to his wife. There is not a scintilla
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next