Talak Ram vs State Of Haryana on 14 October, 2020
Author: Suvir Sehgal
Bench: Suvir Sehgal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ... CHANDIGARH
206 CRM-M-29429-2020
Date of decision:14.10.2020
Talak Ram
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR
appellant, who instituted the suit for
a declaration that the Triple Talak (Muthalak) pronounced by the
plaintiff/husband on 27.04.2015 is valid and binding ... husband sent a letter to the
wife, pronouncing Triple Talak (Muthalak) and thereby dissolving his
marriage with the wife. The aforesaid letter of the husband
Vaijinath S/O. Vishwambhar Talake vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 9 March, 2020
Author: Vibha Kankanwadi
Bench: Vibha Kankanwadi
22-appln ... REVN/97/2015
VAIJINATH S/O. VISHWAMBHAR TALAKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mrs. M. G. Kasturkar
house and all comforts, the witness states that the
accused had given talak to her. The witness denies
that no harassment was given ... custody of the child is still pending.
That he had given talak and the talak which was
issued by the Masjid is not yet signed
taken place between the petitioner and the informant
by way of Triple Talak as back as on 06.12.2006 and thereafter,
the petitioner had filed Matrimonial ... otherwise also there is also
inconsistency in the date of the triple talak in the judgment
passed by the learned Family Court, Hazaribag
BASAPPA
ARABHAVI, AGE: 43 YEARS
OCCUPATION: HOUSE HOLD WORK
R/O.MUGALIHAL, TALAK: RAMADURG
DISTRICT: BELGAUM.
3. SMT. TANGEWWA W/O.SOMAPPA
TOTAGATTI ... YEARS
OCCUPATION: HOUSE HOLD WORK
R/O.SALAHALLI, TALAK: SAUNDATTI
DISTRICT: BELGAUM.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.SHRIKANT T.PATIL AND
SRI. ROHIT S.PATIL, ADVOCATES
applicant and without entering into the legality of the
customary Talak as alleged by the applicant, the applicant now does
not have any subsisting cause ... action in view of his own admission
that he has already given Talak. In that view of the matter, the
present suit is not maintainable
witnesses.
There is also no statement or evidence that the said divorce/ talak was
communicated to the respondent, because under Muslim Law the
communication ... Talak is also essential. In Shamim Ara's case (supra),
the Supreme Court has held in paragraph 16 is as under
lodged by taking the help of new law relating to 'Triple Talak' by falsely alleging that the husband entered the house ... informant and pronounced 'Triple Talak'. It has been submitted that in so far as offence relating to harassment in connection with demand
rest of two, wherein one was husband, who had instantly given triple Talak to informant. This all has been committed by way of criminal house ... This court asked learned counsel for the petitioners as to whether triple Talak has not been given? Though it was said
