Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

even then right in fact, for in the case of Muttuvaduganaadha Tevar v. Periasami (1896) L.R. 23 I.A. 128, Lord Hobhouse, delivering judgment

Henry Hook v. Administrator-General of Bengal ; Rajeswara Sethupati Avergal v. Velusami Tevar . On the other hand, reference may legitimately be made to the judgment

time in that Court, as indicated by the judgment in Oodayanasamy Tevar v. Alagappa Chetty 14 M.L.J. 342. Indeed it is now well

Appeal No. 99 of 1915 and Mahomed Abdul Kadir v. Sami Pandia Tevar ... Appeal No. 99 of 1915 and Mahomed Abdul Kadir v. Sami Pandui Tevar

Kombunni Mannadiar C.M.S.A and Abdul Kadir v. Samipandia Tevar (1920) I.L.R. 43 Mad. 835 that he as well ... unreported) and in Abdul Kadir v. Samipandia Tevar (1920) I.L.R. 43 Mad. 835, whether a mortgagor who obtained a decree for redemption

were pressed with a decision of this Court in Periavenkan Udaya Tevar v. Subramanian Chetti

were pressed with a decision of this Court in Periavenkan Udaya Tevar v. Subramanian Chetty

always involve such a declaration. 11. In Katama Nachiar v. Dora Singa Tevar (1875) 2 I.A. 169 at page 191 it was Laid down

Raja of Ramnad v. Velusami Tevar

even then right in fact, for in the case of Muttuvaduganadha Tevar v. Periasami