Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Raja Rajeswara Sethupati Avergal ... vs Sellachami Tevar And Ors. on 10 March, 1916 Equivalent citations: 34IND. CAS.500, AIR 1917 MADRAS 405 JUDGMENT

assignee of one Poolar Tevan the next reversioner of the deceased Muthudorasanii Tevar has now to be dealt with. The mother of the deceased ... annuity of Rs. 700 settled in January 1861 on Sivasami Tevar the father of Muthudorasami and his" heirs as one of the terms

realised by the sale of the plaintiff's property. In Dorasinga Tevar v. Arunachalam Chetti (1899) I.L.R. 23 M. 441 the defendant ... action, whether he himself paid the debts or not. See Dorasinga Tevar v. Arunachalam Chetti (1899) I.L.R. 23 M. 441. The question

limitation. The learned Vakil for the appellants mainly relied upon Dorasinga Tevar v. Arunachalam Chetti ... regarded as premature. That is the ratio decidendi in Doraisinga Tevar v. Arunachalam Chetti 23 M. 441 : 8 Ind. Dec. (N.S.) 709 The same

affirmed in the Sivagunga case Muttu Vadvganadha Tevar v. Dora Singha Tevar (1881) I.L.R. 3 M. 290, the re-grant would not operate

Kamakhya Ghose (1918) 28 Indian Cases 877 (Cal.) Sunaararaja Ayyangar v. Pattanathuswami Tevar (1894) I.L.R. 17 M. 306 Sinaya Pillai v. Munisami Ayyan

Narasimhachari Ramachundra Dutt v Jogeshioar Narain Deo Subramania Chetty v. Doraisinga Tevar, the authorities to which Mr. Srinivasa Aiyangar called - our attention this morning

cannot overrule a plain provision of law (See Arumugam Chetti v. Doraisinga Tevar (1911) I.L.R. 37 M. 38 at p. 44. In this

Seshagiri Iyer, J,. in Rajah of Ramnad v. Sundara Pandiya Sami Tevar [1914] 27 M.L.J. 694 approved by the Privy Council in Rajah ... Ramnad v. Sundara Pandiyasami Tevar A.I.R. 1918 P.C. 156, holding that the payment of an allowance was a charge. There is also

contemplated by Hindu lawyers. 15. As regards, the decided cases, Sivagnana Tevar, Ramasami Chetti and Eosalarama v. Periasami