Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri K Dinesh vs Sri Kumaraswany And Others on 30 August, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy

G V Bhushan vs Union Of India on 13 January, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy Bench

Tiic f)d'i;iiL?fl3IS nus. I to 3 are ' ézhc..s0n3':?.nd.4"'--.peIitiot

Tiic I)cpu1;\_== ("To11 ... T21lL1§«; . Xfimjgaet, .VI2,tdik€i'i ~ 560 {.)(>8. Tiic State. of §<;1r1"2z1tz.:k:.-1 Rcpms:-:11teci

said that the there is 4 to enable the respondents 'tiic impuwed notice. The contraxy is fialacious xm; gs at the outset is without

icatinfi twin; it direction to put tiic The: petitioners were _aIsu the dcbzis and mac-hinciy mi 'of-vf%s.14.42 takh

1tzii*}j:ing. jE<'at,iz:tiic>-xiii 111.1' criminaii pIT(}S€C.L'§'[i()I1 from the Chief

czIte) ..... __l .3' I , 'V ' Tiic.aK»:IV:'I1ut'I;k:;I IIIE

Infithe aboye facts and circumstances, from a readiiig.f'0f'tiic,Vrules it is clear that the civic amenity site rnea

rzgayraazzs rniiiiaryv g:.x;cn3i:«;e::e~:V "£23? 'ba£tiic prepamgigcss, wiziciz imaé icazi to She giésafbifiiy whézsh firm peiiéiazncr