State. It
committed an error in relation thereto. The paramount title of the State is
not disputed. It remains vested in the State. The State
present amendment, the plaintiffs want to deny the
paramount title of the family of defendant Nos.1 to 5 in respect
State. It
committed an error in relation thereto. The paramount title of the State is
not disputed. It remains vested in the State. The State
trial Judge came to the
conclusion that the plaintiffs have proved the title to the property and decreed ... patta, mutation
of names in the public records, can claim the paramount title
against the plaintiffs who are in possession of the suit property
having
suit, the presence of the
temple, which claims to be the title paramount, is neither essential nor
necessary. A necessary party is one without whose ... 2951 & 2952 of 2023
seeking for declaration of title and permanent injunction, which is also
pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court
suit, the presence of the
temple, which claims to be the title paramount, is neither essential nor
necessary. A necessary party is one without whose ... 2951 & 2953 of 2023
seeking for declaration of title and permanent injunction, which is also
pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court
Municipality and both the parties admitted that the
Municipality is the paramount title holder. Since the Municipality is the
paramount title holder of the suit ... title was acquired by the plaintiff and when the relief is claimed
based on possessory title, the person, who is having a better title, will
Municipality and both the parties admitted that the
Municipality is the paramount title holder. Since the Municipality is the
paramount title holder of the suit ... based on possessory title, the person, who is having a better title, will
succeed and a party claiming right of possessory title cannot get
injunction
vest with the Government and the Government not being the
paramount title-holder, is not entitled to resume the grant. The said
proposition ... appellants to now contend that the Government is not the
paramount title-holder.
7. In view of the above, we do not see any merit
possession thereof, shall be
permitted to deny that such person had a title to such possession at the time when such li-
cence was given ... estopped, when he is under threat of eviction by
the title paramount, from contending that the landlord had no title before the tenancy
commenced
