JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM,
CHAIRPERSON
1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) is the Appellant
herein. Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) is the 1st
Respondent. Central Electricity ... relevant facts. They are as follows.
3. The Appellant Electricity Board (TNEB) is the
Distribution Licensee. The Ist Respondent NLC is owning
generating stations
State Commission praying for setting aside the circular
issued by the TNEB in No. BP FP (146) dated 4.7.2005 by which the
Infrastructure Development Charges ... were imposed and for directing
the TNEB to refund the amount already collected from the Wind Energy
Developers under the head Infrastructure Development Charges mainly
JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM,
CHAIRPERSON
JUDGMENT
1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) is the Appellant. NTPC
Ltd. is the second respondent.
2. The Appellant filed ... station belonging to NTPC for the
period 2001 to 2004. The TNEB was party to the said proceedings
before the Central Commission. By the order
JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM,
CHAIRPERSON
1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) is the Appellant
2. As against the order dated 17.12.2009, passed by the
Central ... Judgment dated 05.11.2009 in Appeal No. 24/09 in
the case of TNEB Versus Central Commission as
reported in 2009 ELR (APTEL) 0856.
(v) Judgment
APCPDCL)
Singareni Bhavan
Red Hills, Hyderabad - 500004
3. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB)
800, Anna Salai
Chennai - 600002
4(a). Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation ... Respondent: Mr. P. R. Kovilan &
Ms. Geeta Kovilan for TNEB, Resp. No. 3
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DATTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
JUDGMENT
Page 26 of 58
Appeal No. 58 of 2010
case involving TNEB and PGCIL. The Order 47 Rule 1
puts a specific bar on considering ... fact in the case of
Power Grid Corporation of India, the TNEB, had challenged the
Tariff Order for the period 2001-04 which
After meeting their in-house requirement, surplus power is
supplied to the TNEB Grid.
5. As the Appellant requires large quantity of bagasse, the
Appellant ... into a long-term tie-up arrangement with
the sugar mills. The TNEB fixed the purchase price for the
SSR Page 2 of 11
Judgment
ground that the claim
was belated, then it was the TNEB who was solely responsible for the
delay in implementing the order of the Commission
Kovilan Poongkuntran & Ms. Geetha
for R.12-TNEB
Mr. Sakesh Kumar for MPPTL
Mr. Manoj Dubey & Mr. Pramod Chowdhary
