incidental facility given to the owner of the
trade mark. It adds nothing to the trade mark itself.
(ii) Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v/s. ACIT ... incidental
facility given to the owner of the trade mark. It adds
nothing to the trade mark itself.
(ii) Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v/s. ACIT
owner of the
„„Bintex‟‟ brand as per the Trade Mark Registration therefore, it cannot be
said that the appellant have used brand name of another ... this
regard, we give here under the scanned copy of the Trade Mark Registration.
From the above registration, it is clear that the appellant
M/S. Integral India Software ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 19 July, 2023
respective companies mentioned
above. To substantiate this, the appellant had produced trade mark
registration request made by Fortune Media Pvt Ltd. The said request
letter ... made
for trade mark has been withdrawn. It is submitted by the ld.
Counsel that even though the request for the trade mark has been
name of M/s BMW in respect of power press vide
trade mark registration certificate no. 265352 dated 28.08.1972.
Thereafter, statements of partner Sh. Kanwarjit
name of M/s BMW in respect of power press vide
trade mark registration certificate no. 265352 dated 28.08.1972.
Thereafter, statements of partner Sh. Kanwarjit
1772/2012,86585,86840/2015
The date of demise of the trade name holder Shri Shariff
Ahmed Ansari is not submitted by the appellants. Therefore ... otherwise.
As seen from the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks,
the registration of the said trade name has been challenged
by Kwality Frozen
1772/2012,86585,86840/2015
The date of demise of the trade name holder Shri Shariff
Ahmed Ansari is not submitted by the appellants. Therefore ... otherwise.
As seen from the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks,
the registration of the said trade name has been challenged
by Kwality Frozen
1772/2012,86585,86840/2015
The date of demise of the trade name holder Shri Shariff
Ahmed Ansari is not submitted by the appellants. Therefore ... otherwise.
As seen from the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks,
the registration of the said trade name has been challenged
by Kwality Frozen
1772/2012,86585,86840/2015
The date of demise of the trade name holder Shri Shariff
Ahmed Ansari is not submitted by the appellants. Therefore ... otherwise.
As seen from the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks,
the registration of the said trade name has been challenged
by Kwality Frozen
