Search Results Page

Search Results

11 - 20 of 4653 (0.48 seconds)

Balbir Sandhu vs Union Of India on 22 April, 2025

numbers were wrongly mentioned in the LOI dated 28.07.2022 due to typographical mistake and the correct khasra numbers were mentioned in the said letter ... mention of mineable area as 10.11 hectares is also a typographical mistake. As per Ambala DSR 2022, the minerals are available in the riverbed
National Green Tribunal Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balbir Sandhu vs Union Of India on 22 April, 2025

numbers were wrongly mentioned in the LOI dated 28.07.2022 due to typographical mistake and the correct khasra numbers were mentioned in the said letter ... mention of mineable area as 10.11 hectares is also a typographical mistake. As per Ambala DSR 2022, the minerals are available in the riverbed
National Green Tribunal Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Eastern Book Company & Others vs Navin J. Desai & Another, D.B. Modak And ... on 17 January, 2001

relied upon, dissented from or distinguished by the Judge in his judgment. Typographical errors which appear in the official copy are corrected and appropriate corrigenda ... each of which the raw sources are checked for spelling mistakes, grammatical/ typographical/ clerical errors. Statutory provisions are stated to be cross-checked and reference
Delhi High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 8 - S K Mahajan - Full Document
Previous   1 2   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next