question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section ... question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section
question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section ... question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section
question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section ... question was registered on 27.2.2009 is
immaterial as the same is typographical mistake, which could be
rectified as per the mandate of section
Town Survey
No. 462 was mistakenly mentioned, which was evidently a typographical mistake.
10. The power of the court to allow such an application ... Prothonotary and
Senior Master was not for the correction of any typographical mistake, but
has affected the rights of the parties. Learned senior counsel distinguished
private
respondents would submit that there is bona fide and
typographical mistake of the private respondents to write
different address. He would further submit that ... sooner,
the private respondents came to know about typographical
mistake in the civil proceedings, they immediately corrected it
by way of amendment, with the permission
University in the year 2002. However, in para 11,
due to typographical mistake it was mentioned as M.A.(Pol.Sc.) from Delhi
University ... from Delhi University in
the year 2002 was correctly mentioned. The typographical mistake of highest
educational qualification in Form-26 affidavit submitted in the year
which could not be included and also that due to some
mistake, typographical, the extent of the properties included in the plaint
schedule ... mistake
mentioned the extent of the properties already shown, incorrectly and also the
door number, which were only due to mistake and typographical errors
University in the year 2002. However, in para 11,
due to typographical mistake it was mentioned as M.A.(Pol.Sc.) from Delhi
University ... from Delhi University in
the year 2002 was correctly mentioned. The typographical mistake of highest
educational qualification in Form-26 affidavit submitted in the year
University in the year 2002. However, in para 11,
due to typographical mistake it was mentioned as M.A.(Pol.Sc.) from Delhi
University ... from Delhi University in
the year 2002 was correctly mentioned. The typographical mistake of highest
educational qualification in Form-26 affidavit submitted in the year
opinion that the inclusion as alleged is a
typographical mistake, as the officer has typed two paragraphs as one
paragraph and however, the point mentioned ... case need not be considered, as the said
contention or typographical mistake made by the authority would not
cause any prejudice to the interest
