deceased defendant
No.2 came to know that a clerical (typographical)
mistake has been crept in the operative portion of the
order dated ... schedule property and that it is
apparent/clerical/typographical mistake. By going
through the entire order, one can make out that the
observation made
application, the applicant submits that while drafting
the election petition, some typographical mistake has occurred through bona
fide mistake and inadvertence on the part ... been pleaded by the applicant/election petitioner that the
said typographical mistake occurred in the election petition of the
applicant/election petitioner is very much
lacs through different modes. However, due to
over sight and by typographical mistake, the mode of payment of total
amount was mentioned ... reasons stated above, the typographical mistakes, which have
been pointed out by the complainant petitioner, should have been
rectified by the trial court, as trial
number was wrongly mentioned as 222951
instead of 022951, due to typographical mistake, which came to notice of
the complainant at the time ... number got mentioned in the complaint and
the affidavit due to typographical mistake, which when came to be noticed, led
to filing of the application
proceeding pending, before the trial court, rather
those were typographical mistakes made in the writ petition,
whereby the word 'not' has been missed ... pending before the
Additional Munsif-II, Ranchi, as such, such typographical mistakes
occurred in writ petition may be ignored and petitioner may be
allowed
said Upendra Lad was shown as proprietor due to the simple
typographical mistake. That typographical accidental mistake
while drafting complaint occurred because all along ... believed that the description of the complainant would be a
typographical mistake. More so, because the complainant has stated on
oath that
with respect to the weight of the contraband are only the
typographical mistakes. No other material contradiction could be pointed
out in the statements ... kilograms and 8 grams chura post. There appears to be
a typographical mistake in describing the weight of the residue parcel in
the cross-examination
submitted with respect to petitioner
by the Police, but due to typographical mistake the names of
other accused persons whose bail was rejected with respect ... learned counsel for the
parties appear to be correct. Such typographical mistakes arose
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46385
petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
***
Due to noticing of typographical mistake, the office has
listed the matter today again before this Court ... Court.
It has been brought to my notice that due to typographical
mistake, case number of main petition has been mentioned
petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
***
Due to noticing of typographical mistake, the office has
listed the matter today again before this Court ... Court.
It has been brought to my notice that due to typographical
mistake, case number of main petition has been mentioned