remand
report has stated that due to typographical mistake, the assessment order has
been passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 153A instead ... assessment order is nothing else but mere typographical
mistake.
11. The Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions and the Remand Report
so submitted
remand
report has stated that due to typographical mistake, the assessment order has
been passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 153A instead ... assessment order is nothing else but mere typographical
mistake.
11. The Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions and the Remand Report
so submitted
remand
report has stated that due to typographical mistake, the assessment order has
been passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 153A instead ... assessment order is nothing else but mere typographical
mistake.
11. The Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions and the Remand Report
so submitted
remand
report has stated that due to typographical mistake, the assessment order has
been passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 153A instead ... assessment order is nothing else but mere typographical
mistake.
11. The Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions and the Remand Report
so submitted
Vedansh Jewels P. Ltd., Jaipur vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 23 December, 2019
iron ore. The point to appreciate is that, to
believe the typographical mistake, there must have the
correct figure either in their application ... reveals, the change of destination for 7392
MT. The defence of typographical mistake has been
raised by the accused for the first time and their
contrary, Ld.CIT.DR submitted that, it is
typographic mistake, which automatically stands covered
under section 292B of the Act. It has been submitted that ... pertains to relevant year.
Ld.CIR DR, submitted that, merely for typographic mistake
of mentioning date of return, will not invalidate notice issued
Page
mentioning of previous year as 2008-09 is
typographical mistake. Therefore, it is nothing but typographical mistake and in all facts and
essence ... passed for A.Y. 2007-08 such typographical mistake is curable u/s 296B of the
LT. Act.
ITA No.261/Kol/2018 Assessment Year
Page 120), the Opposite Party has clarified that it was a typographical mistake. There is force in the contention of the Opposite Party. In case ... Opposite Party that it was only on account of typographical mistake that cost was shown to be calculated in square yards but actually, the same
Page 122), the Opposite Party has clarified that it was a typographical mistake. There is force in the contention of the Opposite Party. In case ... Opposite Party that it was only on account of typographical mistake that cost was shown to be calculated in square yards but actually, the same
