Bina Das vs Union Of India And Ors on 23 February, 2012
documents later in point of time
that it was plainly a typographical mistake as the figure „717‟
quoted in the appellant‟s application ought
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 111 (1.33 seconds)Viswa Vedic Sikshaniketan vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 19 January, 2023
Leave granted to the petitioner to correct the
typographical mistake in the affidavit of service which
is sought to be filed today. Such correction should
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete
Umesh Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 11 April, 2014
writ petitioners, the candidates encountered several mistakes in the questions, difference in the Hindi and English versions thereof, typographical errors and also errors ... view that in option No.3, there was a typographical mistake, but according to it, the same, per se did not justify to delete