paragraph
number 15 of the impugned order, due to typographical mistake, instead of
mentioning cost of litigation, awarded by the District Forum, to the tune ... 7000/-, the amount was mentioned as Rs.10,000/-. Such a typographical
mistake can be corrected at any time.
22.
No other
point, was urged
respondent
booked goods on 02.09.2007 and 03.09.2007, but due to typographical mistake the
date of receiving was shown as 19.07.2007 which was nothing ... filed by the respondent with a view to clarify the above typographical mistake.
He also submitted that the appellant practically has no case
year fixed in the
insurance policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had,
in any case, been rectified in the records of the company
paragraph
number 15 of the impugned order, due to typographical mistake, instead of
mentioning cost of litigation, awarded by the District Forum, to the tune ... 7000/-, the amount was mentioned as Rs.10,000/-. Such a typographical
mistake can be corrected at any time.
22.
No other
point, was urged
year fixed in the insurance
policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had, in any
case, been rectified in the records of the company
year fixed in the
insurance policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had,
in any case, been rectified in the records of the company
year fixed in the insurance
policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had, in any
case, been rectified in the records of the company
year fixed in the
insurance policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had,
in any case, been rectified in the records of the company
year fixed in the
insurance policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had,
in any case, been rectified in the records of the company
materials on record that the same is not a typographical
mistake, but was wilfully and intentionally done. It would have been better
