schedule lands against the
respondents/defendants and due to typographical
mistake it was mentioned as A to C schedule
properties, instead ... that the trial court failed to consider
that the due to typographical mistake A to C Schedule
was mentioned in the prayer portion, instead
schedule lands against the
respondents/defendants and due to typographical
mistake it was mentioned as A to C schedule
properties, instead ... that the trial court failed to consider
that the due to typographical mistake A to C Schedule
was mentioned in the prayer portion, instead
schedule lands against the
respondents/defendants and due to typographical
mistake it was mentioned as A to C schedule
properties, instead ... that the trial court failed to consider
that the due to typographical mistake A to C Schedule
was mentioned in the prayer portion, instead
schedule lands against the
respondents/defendants and due to typographical
mistake it was mentioned as A to C schedule
properties, instead ... that the trial court failed to consider
that the due to typographical mistake A to C Schedule
was mentioned in the prayer portion, instead
only dispute raised by the respondent is that there
was a typographical mistake instead of four years, seven years
was inadvertently typed in the said ... completion thereafter are
not much disputed. The question is can this typographical
mistake would suffer the petitioner from understanding its
meaning. The law is well
numbers were
wrongly mentioned in the LOI dated 28.07.2022 due to typographical mistake
and the correct khasra numbers were mentioned in the said letter ... mention of mineable area as 10.11 hectares is also a typographical
mistake. As per Ambala DSR 2022, the minerals are available in the riverbed
numbers were
wrongly mentioned in the LOI dated 28.07.2022 due to typographical mistake
and the correct khasra numbers were mentioned in the said letter ... mention of mineable area as 10.11 hectares is also a typographical
mistake. As per Ambala DSR 2022, the minerals are available in the riverbed
assessee on the ground that there is only a typographical mistake in
mentioning the URN issued by the CPC for provisional registration instead ... However, in the order granting the registration,
there is a typographical mistake and the section mentioned
2024 wherein it
has been stated that there are certain typographical mistakes
which has occurred in the impugned Tribunal order. These
Typographical mistakes have been ... records and the Tribunal order, we agree
that there are certain typographical mistakes while noting
down the figures and same is rectified as under
2024 wherein it
has been stated that there are certain typographical mistakes
which has occurred in the impugned Tribunal order. These
Typographical mistakes have been ... records and the Tribunal order, we agree
that there are certain typographical mistakes while noting
down the figures and same is rectified as under
