defendant no. 3. Thus, due to the typographical mistake,
the name of defendant no. 3 i.e. petitioner no. 2 was entered. To substantiate ... suit.
Thus, it is only due to the typographical mistake that the name of the petitioner
no. 2 was mentioned in para
execution of the same was
05.11.2015, but inadvertently, due to a typographical mistake, the said
NARESH KUMAR
2026.04.10 14:21
I attest to the accuracy ... typographical mistake but the trial Court has dismissed the
said application. It is argued that the said mistake, which is a
typographical mistake, should have
learned Counsel appearing for
the Respondent No.1 submits that only typographical mistake is
1 Writ Petition No.121 of 2024
2 Civil Appeal ... that it is
candidly stated in the application that due to typographical
mistake wrong date is mentioned in the Marriage Petition and it is
necessary
36787/2017 Page 3 of 43
[Note: There appears typographical mistake
in the above extracted order as the prayer in
IA No.17118/2010 ... Page 18 of 43
array of parties was nothing but a typographical
mistake which ought to be read/considered as a
direction to delete Murarilal
price. According to
respondent No.3, the same was a typographical mistake. The respondent
No.3 accordingly informed it to the respondent Bank. Thereupon ... respondent No.3 is
due to human error or typographical mistake. It is contended that the
respondent-bank has acted in contravention of the terms
which was
issued on 30.05.2017 but there was a simple typographical mistake in the
demand notice as stated above, which is also clarified ... case of the appellant that coming to know
about the inadvertent typographical mistake they have corrected the demand
notice at the time of filing
half
share each to plaintiffs in the operative portion, is a
typographical mistake because in paragraph No.45, the
learned trial judge has held that ... that plaintiffs are entitled
for 1/4th shares each, as a typographical mistake
half
share each to plaintiffs in the operative portion, is a
typographical mistake because in paragraph No.45, the
learned trial judge has held that ... that plaintiffs are entitled
for 1/4th shares each, as a typographical mistake
compromise decree
was passed on 17.07.2025. Subsequently, upon noticing the typographical
mistake, all parties jointly preferred an application under Section 151 read
with Section ... compromise application clearly
demonstrates that due to a typographical mistake, the word "plaintiffs" was
typed in place of "defendants
this document
CRM-M-72612--2025 (O&M) -2-
inadvertent typographical mistake. It was stated that at the time of issuance of the
legal ... NCPHHC 101169
101169,, wherein it was held that
an unintentional typographical mistake regarding the cheque number can be
corrected by way of amendment
