will be 25.6.2020 and not 25.6.2010.There is a typographical mistake
in the policy. Petitioner cannot take undue advantage and benefit ... contracting parties and nobody can take
advantage due to typographic mistake, which stood rectified later on. In
support, learned counsel has relied upon a decision
will be 25.6.2020 and not 25.6.2010.There is a typographical mistake
in the policy. Petitioner cannot take undue advantage and benefit ... contracting parties and nobody can take
advantage due to typographic mistake, which stood rectified later on. In
support, learned counsel has relied upon a decision
Appeals) further held that there was no evidence to show any typographical mistakes in respect of description of services Embroidery Software Charges instead of Documents
paragraph
number 15 of the impugned order, due to typographical mistake, instead of
mentioning cost of litigation, awarded by the District Forum, to the tune ... 7000/-, the amount was mentioned as Rs.10,000/-. Such a typographical
mistake can be corrected at any time.
22.
No other
point, was urged
respondent
booked goods on 02.09.2007 and 03.09.2007, but due to typographical mistake the
date of receiving was shown as 19.07.2007 which was nothing ... filed by the respondent with a view to clarify the above typographical mistake.
He also submitted that the appellant practically has no case
inadvertently or through oversight and that it as a
genuine clerical / typographical mistake with no malafide intentions,
therefore, could not be held as concealment. Therefore ... Supra) is not applicable. He
submitted that due to typographical error the mistake has happened and
assessee had no malafide intention. He submitted that although
year fixed in the
insurance policy was evidently a typographical mistake which had,
in any case, been rectified in the records of the company
paragraph
number 15 of the impugned order, due to typographical mistake, instead of
mentioning cost of litigation, awarded by the District Forum, to the tune ... 7000/-, the amount was mentioned as Rs.10,000/-. Such a typographical
mistake can be corrected at any time.
22.
No other
point, was urged
they have charged wrong price for the said part due to typographical mistake, wherein it was shown
case written in the assessment order as 28.03.07 was a
typographical mistake. In fact, case of the assessee was assigned to DCIT,
CC-1, Thane ... assessee after going through the record produced by the Revenue regarding
the typographical error occurred as to the date mentioned on the satisfaction
note, could
